Home

SEARCH

Airport Screeners Closer to Bargaining Rights. Will Bush Veto?

by Mike Hall, Mar 15, 2007

Earlier this month, after President Bush promised to veto a domestic security bill if the legislation gave bargaining rights to airport screeners, we asked, “What’s more important to President Bush, fighting terrorism or busting unions?”

We’re going to find out pretty soon because on March 13 the U.S. Senate passed the bill by a 60–38 vote, and it carries out most of the recommendations of the bipartisan Sept. 11 commission and includes collective bargaining rights for 43,000 screeners in the Transportation Security Administration (TSA).

The U.S. House version also included bargaining rights and when a House-Senate conference soon crafts a final bill, it too will say airport screeners can bargain for a better life—unless of course Bush chooses union-busting over homeland security by vetoing it.

Says AFGE President John Gage:

For too long, TSOs [screeners] have been deprived of basic worker rights. With this vote, the Senate has voiced its support for TSOs to have the same rights as other federal employees, including those in the Department of Homeland Security.

If it survives, the bill would repeal a portion of the 2002 Aviation and Transportation Security Act that gave the Bush administration authority to end bargaining rights for TSA workers. In 2003, as TSA workers at several airports were readying to vote on joining AFGE, the Bush administration terminated the screeners’ collective bargaining rights, citing so-called “national security” concerns. Congressional Republicans then blocked several attempts to restore the workers’ rights.

The Senate voted three times to keep the workers’ rights provisions in the bill, including  March 6, when the Senate defeated (51–46) an amendment to the bill that would have removed workers’ freedom to bargain. But the 60–38 final vote still falls short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a veto.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (2)

2 Comments

  1. David Hurlburt on 15.03.2007 at 16:40 (Reply)

    Right after 9-11 at the SFO airport the national guard helped screen passengers but there is no requirement that they be citizens. SFO lost many good screeners but they got to keep their union. The security at SFO is one of the best in the country so having a union does not effect our national security. The pilots, Baggage handlers, flight attendants and Mechanics all are union This is just plain bogus!

  2. Willy on 16.03.2007 at 16:16 (Reply)

    Its a change in homeland security much needed and I say send it to the president and if he does veto it take our case to the public as I feel the public is at last on the workers side. Charlie Williams, IAM, San Diego, CA

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Register to Comment and sign up to get action alerts and e-news.

 
Jeff Crosby
Bear Sterns B.S.? Jeff Crosby, president of IUE-CWA Local 201 in Lynn, Mass., has had enough of it.
Read more diaries from the field >>
 
David Brody
Unions and the Public Interest
 
Contact Us | Disclaimer