Home

SEARCH

Political, Union Leaders Say Fight for Employee Free Choice Is Not Over

by James Parks, Jun 27, 2007

 
   

The fight to allow workers a free choice to join a union without employer interference is far from over. After a handful of obstructionist senators blocked a vote on the Employee Free Choice Act yesterday, an array of political and union leaders made it clear the momentum is growing for this legislation and that it’s a matter of when, not if, this bill becomes law. The next step: Elect a Senate that will pass the bill and a president who will sign it.

Here’s a sample of some statements issued after the vote:

  • AFSCME President Gerald McEntee: “The struggle to enact the Employee Free Choice Act is not over. A majority of senators are now on record supporting an America where the middle class thrives, seniors can afford their prescriptions, parents can afford to send their children to college and workers can afford to retire with security.” (See video.)
  • Presidential candidate John Edwards: “Today, a majority of the Senate stood up to make it easier for workers to join a union. A minority of senators showed which side they are on by blocking the bill today—but they won’t be able to block it forever. If a Republican can join the Republican Party by signing their name to a card, any worker in America ought to be able to join a union by doing exactly the same thing.”
  • Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), the bill’s sponsor, along with 46 other senators: ” Today’s vote sends a clear signal to the American public about which party stands with working people—and although we were blocked today we will not give up and we will not give in. I can promise that we will be back. There may be obstacles along the way, but we’ll keep up the fight until we get a victory for working families.”    

  • United Steelworkers President Leo Gerard: “The Employee Free Choice Act will remain an issue working families and their communities will continue to work until we achieve a Democratic majority in the U.S. Senate and elect a new president in 2008.

  • Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.): “I am disappointed the Senate failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. Strengthening our workers’ right to organize shouldn’t be controversial. It will be working Americans, united and organized, that will help us restore a sense of shared prosperity and security to this nation.”

  • AFT President Edward McElroy: “The current fight for workers’ rights is gaining momentum and will not be stopped. A union card is a tried-and-true ticket to the middle class, and the AFT and its members will continue to advocate for laws—at all levels of government-that safeguard the freedom of employees to join a union and bargain for a better life.”
  • Mine Workers President Cecil Roberts: “Those who voted today to deny working men and women the ability to decide for themselves whether or not they want a union where they work also voted to allow the atmosphere of corporate-sponsored fear and intimidation so prevalent in union representation elections to continue. I want them to know that we will remember their vote, too.” (Click here to hear a radio debate with Roberts on the Employee Free Choice Act.) 

  • Sen. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.): “More working families, not fewer, deserve access to the higher wages, better health care, and retirement security that union membership brings. Today the Senate sought simply to reaffirm the basic proposition that every worker in this country has the democratic right to associate freely and, if they so choose, join or form a union.”

  • Presidential candidate Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.): “Passing this legislation would have been a crucial step in the fight for strengthening worker’s rights. Although I am frustrated by the obstructionist tactics employed by some Senators to prevent full debate on this measure, I will continue to work to put real teeth in our labor laws and help improve the working conditions for all American workers.” 

  • Rep. Phillip Hare (D-Ill.): “Anti-union forces should take only temporary comfort in today’s vote. With 69 percent of Americans supporting the Employee Free Choice Act, I expect that any senator who blocked this bill will be held to account by their constituents. This legislation will pass. It’s only a matter of when.”

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (8)

8 Comments

  1. pace on 27.06.2007 at 16:55 (Reply)

    Oh good. Now the workers are put on hold for another almost two years, meanwhile our Congress is busy getting trying to import exploitable, impoverished, temporary employees to create more job insecurity and lower living standards for us. And we’re supposed to be happy and get more DLC (CONservative) Democrats elected using what little money we have left? How about they attach the Employee Free Choice Bill to this “Guest” worker (Immigration) Bill?

  2. Paul Hosse on 27.06.2007 at 19:42 (Reply)

    Good points all Pace. I’m sorry to say that Kentucky’s two senators voted not support working Americans. At least one (Bunning) voted against the Amnesty Bill.

  3. puddleP on 27.06.2007 at 21:18 (Reply)

    The Chamber of Commerce is steadfastly opposed to the Employee Free Choice Act. Although not specifically mentioned in this article the Chamber of Congress spends millions of dollars lobbying locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. I’ve found references to Chamber of Commerce in foreign countries, especially around free trade acts, and fast track re-authorization.
    How is labor counter-attacking their power? What is their agenda? Who are they and how are they funded? Our local Chambers seem like good community citizen groups, who for example, sponsor local kids sports teams; contribute to police and fire fundraisers; and help senior citizens . Yet, the national Chamber,representing mutinational corporations is anything but benign. “Commerce” , whose interests are represented and fought for?
    Again, what is this group’s mandate? how are they funded? who do they represent? where can they be influenced? how big are they? what ties community to international bodies? how are they represented????

  4. Scott on 28.06.2007 at 18:29 (Reply)

    Having been in Washington DC for the Rally for the EFCA, and Lobbied Senator Smith from Oregon, ( I really talked to a staff member who had a bobbling head like you see on a doll). I do believe that Organized Labor must continue our election sweep from last November and let those who opposed EFCA know that we will continue to replace those who will not support Working Americans. 2008 is closing in fast, and They Know It!

  5. Cynical on 28.06.2007 at 18:44 (Reply)

    “Political, Union Leaders Say Fight for Employee Free Choice Is Not Over”
    As a WW11 combat veteran, I feel the war is still raging on for survival of the working families and our standard of living which has been deterorating since Big Business started sending jobs overseas, illegal immigrants taking our jobs and with the exports no where near balanced with the imports, thanks to our Presidents and our Congress.

  6. Bob on 29.06.2007 at 23:00 (Reply)

    I would encourage ever union member to commit to electing a labor friendly president. Bush has been a disaster for working men and women.

  7. brojoe on 30.06.2007 at 09:08 (Reply)

    We should not wait for 2008 for the EFCA. We should not wait for 2008 to be rid of the bush regime. We need to pass the EFCA at the state level just like the minimum wage. Impeachment resolutions are also being done at the more local level. We deserve better! Power concedes nothing without demand. We need to march in the streets & demand it, if we don’t get what we deserve.

  8. Cynical on 01.07.2007 at 13:05 (Reply)

    Both our Representative Senators in California, Feinstein and Boxer, supported the American working People by supporting this measure.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Register to Comment and sign up to get action alerts and e-news.

 
Jeff Crosby
Bear Sterns B.S.? Jeff Crosby, president of IUE-CWA Local 201 in Lynn, Mass., has had enough of it.
Read more diaries from the field >>
 
David Brody
Unions and the Public Interest
 
Contact Us | Disclaimer