SEARCH
Lilly Ledbetter: Congress Needs to Tackle Unfair Supreme Court Ruling |
|
 |
|
Lilly Ledbetter doesn’t think much of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s listening skills.
Alito was part of the 5-4 majority that in May ruled Ledbetter was simply too late in filing suit over 20 years of pay discrimination at a Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. plant in Alabama where she was paid less than the men doing the same job.
The court said she should have initiated her lawsuit no more than 180 days after she received the first short paycheck, even though it took her years to discover the difference–and longer to dig up the proof. The decision tossed out a lower court’s award of $3.8 million for her for two decades of pay discrimination.
In a just-posted interview (see video)—passed along by Josh Aaron Glassteter at People for the American Way—Ledbetter says:
I felt that Alito from Day One when the case was heard, that he had a closed mind and was not going to listen to the arguments…They voted me down. They voted 5–4. I lost by one vote; it was not fair. It wasn’t even close to being fair. We must go to Congress, to the House and the Senate to prevent this from happening in the future to other females and minorities. I have a granddaughter who will come along in the workforce in about 20 years, and I hope that the law is changed and things will be much easier for her.
It could be a lot sooner than that. In June, the House Education and Labor Committee approved the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act that now awaits floor action. Last week, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and a bipartisan group of 14 co-sponsors introduced the Senate version, the Fair Pair Restoration Act.
Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, many courts allowed workers to sue for pay discrimination years after the initial discrimination because the courts considered each new paycheck a new discriminatory act.
Generally speaking, both bills would clarify that every paycheck or other compensation resulting, in whole or in part, from an earlier discriminatory pay decision constitutes a violation of the Civil Rights Act. As long as workers file their charges within 180 days of a discriminatory paycheck, their charges would be considered timely.
Says Kennedy:
It is unacceptable that some victims of ongoing pay discrimination are unable to hold their employers accountable. Yet that’s what happened to Lilly Ledbetter. I hope that all of us on both sides of the aisle can join in correcting this obvious wrong.
3 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Expect more of this. Now that the supreme court is conservative, all the bosses have to do is instruct their army of lawyers to appeal cases untill they reach the high court. They can then be confident their silly, nightgown wearing buddies will rule in their favor.
Why must everyone SUE everyone else. Fear of lawsuits by employees are the root of many labor struggles.If we do not get some PRO Labor representation soon we will become more divied than we already are. I belive most people are not looking for a lawsuit but they would like FAIR PAY,bENEFITS with no gender/race discrimination. We all know that the pay gap is so WIDE you could double everyone’s salary and we would all still be behind.It is long over due for Labor and Managment to come to the Bargaining table.
What we need to observe, even more than the absolutely grotesque rulings of the first session of the “Roberts court”, is the consistently unified manner in which all these bad rulings were handed down. Almost without exception, five conservative judges held together against the other four. In other words, the “vast right wing conspiracy” is firmly in place and it’s not going away. The “New Deal” is under serious attack and that attack won’t abate due to a change in the White House, even though that’s our only hope.