Home

SEARCH

Border Fence Shuts Out U.S. Steelworkers, Threatens Environment

Bookmark and Share

by James Parks, Oct 23, 2007

 
A section of the fence along the U.S.-Mexico border was made with pipe from China.
 
Photo credit: Gerald Dickey/USW
Steelworker Mickey Bolt

Once again, the Bush administration is sending work overseas that could be done here and ignoring laws that get in the way of what it wants to accomplish.

This time it’s the $1.2 billion, 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border that’s supposed to make us more secure. Seems part of the fence is made out of pipes from China, and it’s being built in a way that’s jeopardizing one of the world’s top natural wonders.

Members of the Congressional Steel Caucus, who represent districts where the steel industry is struggling, condemned the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for using Chinese-made pipe when U.S. companies could do the job.  

Says Rep. Pete Visclosky (D-Ind.), chairman of the Steel Caucus:

The Chinese can’t make safe toys, and this is the national security infrastructure.

A member of the United Steelworkers (USW), Mickey Bolt of Transfer, Pa., was the one who blew the whistle on DHS. He saw pictures of the pipes with “China” written on them and sent the picture to his congressman, Rep. Phil English (R-Pa.), whose staff confirmed through sources at DHS that Chinese pipe was being used on the project. Bolt, who worked at pipe maker Wheatland Tube Co. for 31 years, told the Sharon, Pa., Herald:  

The contractor submitted the price based on using foreign material and was just hoping that the government wouldn’t check closely. If government inspectors couldn’t see this, then they must need a seeing-eye dog.

It’s a shame you don’t have the government looking out for American industry and the American worker.

Wheatland Tube closed its Sharon pipe plant a year ago, citing illegally dumped Chinese pipe imports as the main culprit. Chinese imports of steel tube, pipe and fittings products will reach about 3.9 million tons this year, making up some 30 percent of the U.S. market.

English says the use of Chinese pipes is “outrageous”: 

At a time when pipe and tube plants in my district are being shuttered, it is outrageous that the tax dollars of those people are going to put Chinese pipe into an American fence….It will take more than a coat of whitewash to clear away this outrageous mistake.

In June, the USW and six U.S. pipe companies filed an anti-dumping complaint against illegal imports of China pipe. Two years ago, Bush rejected a trade petition to place tariffs on Chinese pipe imports flooding into the United States.

Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.) says buying Chinese pipe sends the wrong message to U.S. workers and businesses.

Steel companies across the country are struggling because of China’s unfair trade practices. The administration should not reward China’s flagrant disregard for U.S. trade law by making deals with Chinese steel pipe manufacturers. Instead, our federal government should put American companies and their workers first.

Meanwhile, Think Progress today points out that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is ignoring court orders and concern for the environment to build the fence. He waived several environmental laws yesterday to continue building the border fence through a national conservation area in Arizona.

A federal judge halted construction of the fence Oct. 10 after finding the government had failed to carry out the required environmental assessment. Sean Sullivan of a southeastern Arizona branch of the Sierra Club, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, said in a statement:

We can secure our borders while we protect our public lands. Bulldozing the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area and our important environmental protections is not necessary to manage the border.

The San Pedro River is one of the last free-flowing rivers in the southwestern United States. The conservation area through which it runs is one of America’s most unique and biologically diverse areas. The San Pedro region has been designated as a World Heritage Natural Area by the U.N. World Heritage program. Some 250 species of migratory birds have been recorded in the area, which led to its designation as a Globally Important Bird Area by the National Audubon Society, American Bird Conservancy and the international Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (4)

4 Comments

  1. David Hurlburt on 23.10.2007 at 21:23 (Reply)

    …Tax breaks for America’s richest one percent.
    Accumulating debt as if we’re hell bent.
    There is the largest national debit any time for this land.
    Our children and grandchildren must pay back China and Japan.

    The Government waste and the fraud that is out of control,
    You have your corporate buddies on the government dole.
    We could all have health care with the money they stole.
    To veto child health care just proves that you have no Soul.

    A FENCE AT THE BORDER MADE WITH CHINESE STEEL
    ADVERTISING THE TRUTH CHINA OWNS US FOR REAL
    BORDER PATROL UNIFORMS MADE IN MEXICO
    IT IS TIME TO SAY TO CONGRESS HELL NO

  2. Dr on 24.10.2007 at 11:50 (Reply)

    We sould not be using any foreign material on the border fence or foreign workers either.But I’m willing to sacrifice a few birds if it protects this country form a foreign invasion of illegal immigrants.Which do you suppose will cost us more in the long run?Have you seen some of the trash left in these areas by the illegals flooding into this country?When was the last time the UN did anything that benefitted this country?All the UN wants is to control us.

  3. Paul B on 29.10.2007 at 14:22 (Reply)

    I would rather smash the fence, open our borders and have international solidarity among workers than sacrifice even one bird, fish, reptile, mammal, insect, plant, arachnid, or amphibian. The natural environment needs every part of the ecosystem to be protected to be sustainable. No human is illegal, nor is any migratory bird. Any union worker who participates in this desecration is a tool of the corporate destroyers of our planet. Not to mention that much of the land along the border is Indian Land and the rights of the indigenous people should come before any phony national security claims of the colonial settler state.

  4. Dr on 29.10.2007 at 16:52 (Reply)

    Paul,I hope your grand children can agree with you,because it looks like your going to get what you want.You shoul ask the Indian about the failure to control borders,look what happened to them.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Contact Us | Disclaimer