SEARCH
Boeing Workers Rally to Stop Bad Tanker Deal |
Thanks to Kathy Cummings of the Washington State Labor Council for this blog on a rally in Everett, Wash., to protest the U.S. Air Force’s decision to award one of our nation’s largest military contracts to a foreign company.
More than 300 Boeing workers joined with the Washington state congressional delegation, Gov. Christine Gregoire and other elected officials yesterday in Everett to call on the Air Force to get a reality check on its decision to send American jobs and national security and trade secrets to a foreign competitor in the form of the $40 billion refueling tanker contract.
The “Tanker Travesty,” as the deal has come to be known, refers to the decision by the Air Force to award to EADS/Airbus and its minority partner, Northrop Grumman, a contract to replace the U.S. fleet of refueling tankers. Boeing, the American company that has been producing defense aircraft including the original fleet of air refueling tankers for the past 75 years, has appealed to the Government Accountability Office on the grounds that the proposal was altered, after the bids were in, to favor the foreign competitor.
At a time when American jobs are disappearing and our manufacturing base is being decimated, the Air Force passed over Boeing’s proposal, which would have supported at least 44,000 new and existing jobs in the United States, many of them good union jobs, and more than 300 suppliers in 40 states. But now only a few thousand lower-paying nonunion jobs will be created. (Click here to send a message to your representatives in Congress, urging them to overturn this decision.)
Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) says the decision must be reversed in order to ensure America’s national security, to keep 44,000 high-skill jobs here in the United States and to preserve our country’s aerospace industry.
We have a reputation for delivering for our military. We have a workforce that is ready to build an airplane on day one—they have a paper airplane.
Murray pointed out that EADS/Airbus has never built a tanker. EADS has not even begun to build the facility, which they plan to place in Alabama, a “right to work” state, where they can get the cheapest labor possible.
Washington State Labor Council President Rick Bender told the crowd that Republican presidential nominee John McCain has been working behind the scenes for the last five years to ensure that EADS/Airbus got the contract. McCain not only lobbied for the foreign company to get the job, but two of his high-ranking campaign officials were hired as lobbyists by EADS to get the deal done. Bender also pointed out that McCain has taken tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from EADS.
As a matter of fact, on the eve of his trip to France this weekend, the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers (IFPTE) urged McCain to clarify his role in the Air Force’s decision. IFPTE Secretary-Treasurer Paul Shearon said:
You can’t be the champion for honest and open government and have EADS lobbyists working for your presidential campaign while pressuring the Air Force to make exemptions for a foreign contractor that accepts illegal subsidies to compete unfairly with U.S. companies.
Published reports indicate that McCain wrote to Undersecretary of Defense Gordon England and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates pushing for modifications and exemptions to the contract that allowed EADS to bypass restrictions that prevent domestic companies like Boeing from selling military technologies such as missile defense systems to enemy states like Iran.
Rep. Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) told the crowd that the only way EADS/Airbus operates is with subsidies the United States says are illegal. In fact, even as the $40 billion contract is being handed over, the federal government is aggressively pursuing legal action against EADS at the World Trade Organization for getting grants and loans at unfairly favorable rates.
Gregoire said awarding the tanker deal to EADS/Airbus is one of the worst procurement decisions in recent history. The plane’s design is too big to fit in the hangers in which the National Guard houses the current tankers, meaning every single hanger will have to be rebuilt, she added.
The contract also raises national security issues. Workers at Boeing—members of the Machinists (IAM) and the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace/IFPTE Local 2001 (SPEEA)—undergo security checks and rigorous background clearances. But it is unclear if the European workers, as well as immigrants who are hired to build the scattered parts of this crucial piece of military equipment prior to its final assembly, will be vetted in the same way.
Murray also questioned the wisdom of allowing all the foreign countries working on the EADS plane to have access to the plans and design of the aircraft. In a meeting after the rally, she said U.S. vulnerability will increase sharply if EADS, which is under no obligation to keep our military secrets, shares the tanker design with countries which now have no refueling tanker capability.
Murray asked how long will it be before Iran or Pakistan acquire the knowledge and capability to manufacture their own tanker so that their military planes, which don’t have the capacity to reach the United States now, suddenly have the nation in their sites?
5 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Building Bridges: Your Community and Labor Report
National Edition
Produced by Ken Nash and Mimi Rosenberg
*************************
Labor’s Agenda Fighting Corporate Greed
with
Richard Trumpka, Secretary Treasurer of the AFL-CIO
and
William Scheuerman, President, National Labor College
In a free wheeling discussion on the agenda for the labor movement, Trumpka and Scheuerman analyze the challenges workers face in an economy controlled by corporate interests who have rigged the system to their benefit at the expense of the living standards of workers. They point to the need for education & political mobilization of the working class to change the system, pointing to some hopeful signs such as new attitudes of workers towards unions, political mobilization of workers outside of unions, the increase in member-ship in unions and an expanded role of the National Labor College in education of workers and developing clarity on key issues of crucial concern to the movement.
********************************************
To Download or listen to this 27:54 minute radio program,
Go To:
http://www.archive.org/details/BuildingBridgesRadioLaborsAgendaToFightCorporateGreed
for more information contact Ken Nash - knash@igc.org
Building Bridges is regularly broadcast live over WBAI,
99.5 FM in the N.Y.C Metropolitan area on Mondays from
7-8pm EST and is streamed, archived and pod cast at
www.wbai.org
Building Bridges National Edition is regularly broadcast over:
WGOT - Gainesville, Florida.
WUOW - Oneonta, N.Y.
WWUH, - West Hartford, CT
WVJW- Benwood, WV
KRFP, Moscow, ID
KCSB, Santa Barbara, CA
WXOJ, Northampton, MA
KSOW,Cottage Grove, Oregon
WKNH ,Keene, NH
CKDU, Halifax, N.S., Canada
KRFC, Fort Collins, Colorado
WRPI, Troy, New York
WNRB, Wausau, WI
KRBS, Oroville, CA
WHLD, Buffalo, NY
Radio Free Olympia,Olympia,WA
KQRP Salida, California
East Hill Radio, Snoqualmie, WA
as well as internet stations:
Radio Veronica,West Point, PA
The Journey Radio
WXXE
Seattle Radical Radio
Radio for Peace International
Radio Labourstart
AmericanFM.org
RadioDriftless.org
Grateful Dread Public Radio
=========================================
For archived Building Bridges National Programs go to
www.buildingbridgesradio.org
While the US heads into a recession, our government is seeking to employ foreign workers to build military aircraft when we have full capabilities to do it ourselves. This disgusts me that our federal government would even consider this proposal. Par for the course in the Bush administration.
***There’s a John McCain component to this to this swindle also.
I am by no stretch of the imagination a supporter of Bush, McCain or their party which caters to the haves and ignores the have-nots. However, I am concerned that the bitchin’ and ballyhoo over Boeing not receiving this particular contract is based more strongly on anti-Bush, anti-McCain or anti-French sentiments than it is on the facts. Per information found on their respective websites, Airbus actually employs more Americans than does Boeing, many of them in union shops. And then, there is the “conveniently” overlooked fact that if Boeing had won this contract, two of the tankers largest components would be built in Japan and Italy. Both companies have a worldwide business presence. Both employ thousands of Americans. The fact that Boeing’s physical headquarters is on American soil should not be used to guarantee Boeing any and all government contracts.
Maybe it is time American workers stopped listening to overblown rhetoric and started researching the facts. After all, it was the tendency most Americans have to “hear and accept”, instead of to “hear, research, and fact-find” BEFORE making critical decisions that gave this country 7 years of George W. Bush.
The treasonous decision by the Air Force to outsource their new air refueling tanker to Airbus, a foreign manufacturer, is a logical progression for our nation and its current economic practices. As our nation continues to shed manufacturing capacity, The Boeing Company’s reliance on foreign suppliers for production of all models of airframes it undercuts the Machinists Union’s argument for an “American Made” tanker. Unless our government adopts a set of strategic national industrial policies, our ability to manufacture goods will be degraded to the point when our nation is completely dependent on others to provide the military hardware needed to defend America.
Uh oh, there’s a rat in the pantry!
Help me out here. I’m confused (not really, but for editorial purposes I’ll feign confusion).
“Our” government just awarded a $40 billion refueling tanker contract to an airplane manufacturer who will have much of the work done overseas by a foreign workforce. Some estimate that 44,000 American jobs will be lost as a result of the decision by the Air Force to award the contract to EADS/Airbus and its minority partner, Northrop Grumman.
It’s great to see Members of Congress and the labor community strongly objecting to the Air Force’s back door deal. No way around it: It is absolutely wrong to send U.S. jobs offshore.
That being said, is it somehow ok to bring foreign workers to Mississippi to work in shipyards when we have so many unemployed shipyard workers here at home?
I don’t get it. Big-wigs complain when jobs go offshore, but are complicit in bringing offshore workers to do jobs here. What’s the difference?
And please, please, please, don’t anyone complain about “undocumented workers”. The imported shipyard workers were all documented!
This post should not be construed to be anti-immigrant or anti-undocumented worker. It is neither.
It’s purpose is to call attention to the shell game corporations and Congress allows to take place.
Just as sending aerospace jobs offshore is crooked, so too is importing “guest workers” to perform shipyard work in Mississippi (or anywhere else). There are plenty of qualified and available shipyard workers here in the U.S. The only reason “guest workers” were bought in was to get cheap labor in order to line the pockets of unscrupulous corporations. They, in turn, grease the palms of the politicians who support similar, unwarranted guest worker recruitment.
C’mon Congress. Have an idea. Be consistent!
And where was labor’s protest against recruiting “guest workers” to do jobs when skilled Americans are available?
What’s wrong with labor in Mississippi? Why hasn’t it been raising holy hell?
U.S. aerospace jobs to U.S. aerospace workers! U.S. shipyard jobs to U.S. shipyard workers!