SEARCH
Straight Talk on McCain’s Health Care Record from Elizabeth Edwards
![]() |
|
Elizabeth Edwards says voters should take a close look at Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain’s plan, one she says is far from the “straight talk” McCain so frequently claims he’s all about.
Edwards’ concern over the future of the nation’s health care system is shared by most of those who, like Donna in Florida and Cathey in New York, recently took the AFL-CIO/Working America 2008 Health Care for America Survey. Of the more than 26,000 people who completed our survey, nearly 7,500 respondents took the time to write about their personal health care experiences. Some 79 percent of respondents say that come November, candidates who can best fix the nation’s broken health care system will be a major factor in who gets their vote.
Edwards, whose husband, former Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.), withdrew from this year’s Democratic presidential race, weighed in on McCain’s health care reform proposals at a meeting of health care journalists last weekend and again yesterday in a blog post on the Wonk Room after McCain’s campaign accused her of not understanding McCain’s proposal. McCain’s plan is one most, experts say, recycles failed Bush administration schemes that rely on the current private insurance system. In other words, McSame.
She told the journalists that as cancer survivors, neither she nor McCain (who survived a bout with melanoma) would be covered by his health policy because insurance companies wouldn’t have to cover pre-existing conditions like breast cancer and melanoma.
His plan does not set requirements on whom insurers should cover nor what they may charge. Insurance providers routinely coverage to cancer survivors. She also pointed out that McCain’s plan would encourage insurance companies to move to states with weak consumer protection laws, to avoid new tougher laws some states have passed to protect health care consumers.
After McCain’s campaign charged Edwards with misunderstanding his plan, Edwards took to the blog world to respond. In her Wonk Room post, she writes:
I am not confused by John McCain’s health care proposal….The problem is that, despite fuzzy language and feel-good lines in the senator’s proposal, I do understand exactly how devastating it will be to people who have the health conditions with which the senator and I are confronted (melanoma for him, breast cancer for me) but do not have the financial resources we have. In very unconfusing language: they are left outside the clinic doors.
She then asks McCain for some straight talk and answers to a series of questions about his plan and health care costs, co-pays, insurance companies, required coverage and more.
I am not confused about your reputation: you are the straight-talker, you like to say. This is about health care, Senator McCain. Doesn’t the American voter deserve some straight answers to these questions.
Answers we all deserve, especially those like Donna, who writes on our Health Care in America Survey that “more and more coverage is slipping away as co-payments increase every year,”
but as I require additional treatment I am finding a lot of red tape, hassles, tests not covered or partially covered. I feel that they whittle away at what and where things are covered. We believed one thing and are noticing it is not so black and white….
I have two teenagers and thank God they are healthy, but I am concerned for their future and mine as I grow older. I really hope getting the right president in office will make a difference.
In New York, Cathey says the soaring cost of health care forced her family to choose between health care and other necessities.
My family is experiencing a financial meltdown because of the lack of affordable insurance. We simply had to give up our insurance because the monies that were needed for our health coverage are excessive….Let’s hope the upcoming presidential and local elections put people in office who truly care about this extremely critical issue.
McCain may want to paint his health care plan in a good light, but the AFL-CIO’s John McCain Revealed site offers the real straight talk on McCain’s health care plan, which would:
-
Tax your health care benefits.
-
Lead employers to eliminate benefits.
-
Leave working families at the mercy of big insurance companies.
-
Fail to cut costs or cover more people.
For a more detailed look at McCain’s proposal, click here.
The two Democratic candidates contending for the presidential nomination, Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) and Barack Obama (Ill.), have released comprehensive health plans aimed at providing health care coverage.
| Become a Fan on Facebook | Follow Us on Twitter | Subscribe to YouTube | Subscribe to Blog RSS | ||||||||
3 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.











Mr. Edwards, prior to dropping out of the presidential race, stated he would support a single payer plan.
Mr. Obama addressing the Ill. AFL-CIO in 2003, said he was a proponent of single payer, he even said that during the debates. Now he said his statement was taken out of context.
Hillary, mandates!
McCain, tax breaks!
Over 390 union organizations endorse HR 676, SINGLE PAYER!
We have health care now?
Oh sorry that was lost back in the 90′s!
Lets elect the person that lost it, right!
You can not be a true democrat and be for
Clinton (supporter of NAFTA, Wal-Mart board person,
is scared of the word ‘union’). Obama will be the first
true President supporter of Unions since Roosevelt, Truman!!!!!
Clinton didn’t pay health insurance bills
By KENNETH P. VOGEL | 3/31/08 10:50 AM EST Text Size:
Among the debts reported this month by Hillary Clinton’s struggling presidential campaign, the $292,000 in unpaid health insurance premiums for her campaign staff stands out.
Photo: AP
Among the debts reported this month by Hillary Rodham Clinton’s struggling presidential campaign, the $292,000 in unpaid health insurance premiums for her campaign staff stands out.
Clinton, who is being pressured to end her campaign against Barack Obama for the Democratic nomination, has made her plan for universal health care a centerpiece of her agenda.
The campaign provides health insurance to all its employees, their spouses, partners and children — and that wasn’t interrupted by any lag in payments to insurance providers, said Jay Carson, a Clinton campaign spokesman.
He said the campaign this month paid off all outstanding bills to Aetna Healthcare and CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield. Those payments will be reflected on a report the campaign will file this month with the Federal Election Commission, which Carson said will show “zero debt owed to both vendors.”
“Sometimes invoices are not paid immediately because we need additional information for our records, or to verify expenses,” Carson said in a statement e-mailed to Politico. “Sometimes invoices arrive at the very end of the month at the cutoff of the reporting period, which means that we are required to report them as a debt on the current FEC report, even where they are paid in regular course during the next month.”
See Also
Cash-strapped Clinton fails to pay bills
Superdelegates: A guide to the undecided
Gore launches $300 million campaign
But the unpaid bills to Aetna were at least two months old, according to FEC filings.
They show the campaign ended last year owing Aetna more than $213,000 for “employee benefits.”
During the first two months of the year, the campaign did not pay down any of that debt. In fact, it accrued another $16,000 in unpaid bills last month, and it finished the month owing Aetna $229,000.
Though the campaign reported owing $63,000 to Carefirst at the end of February for employee benefits, it appears Clinton paid that company on a more frequent basis. The New York senator’s presidential campaign began the month owing $299,000 to Carefirst, but paid that amount in its entirety, and the $63,000 it owed at the end of the month appears to be from services rendered last month.
Campaigns resemble businesses in many ways. Like businesses, one of their biggest costs is salaries, payroll taxes and the benefits of their employees. Also like businesses, they tend to carry unpaid bills as debt from week-to-week or even month-to-month.
But Arizona Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, did not report any unpaid bills to insurance providers at the end of February. And the only insurance-related debt reported by Obama, an Illinois senator, was $908 to AIG American International Group for “insurance.”
Their campaigns also reported substantially less debt overall than Clinton’s, which owed $8.7 million at the end of February. Obama owed $625,000 and McCain $4.3 million, though most of his debt was from a bank loan, and only $1.3 million was in the form of unpaid bills to a dozen vendors.
Carson stressed that Clinton’s campaign pays all its bills “regularly and in the normal course of business