SEARCH
Momentum for Employee Free Choice Keeps Growing |
|
![]() |
|
The momentum for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act is growing every day as more and more elected officials and political candidates sign on in support of the bill. They recognize that having a union card is the best way to build the middle class and to restore balance to the workplace.
In Richmond, Va., some 21 candidates for mayor and city council already have signed cards calling on their representatives to vote for the bill. If enacted, the Employee Free Choice Act would allow workers to freely decide how they want to choose a union—a decision now in the hands of the employer.
Workers have made passage of the Employee Free Choice Act a key priority in the upcoming elections. More than 800,000 workers have signed postcards and petitions calling on the new Congress and president to enact the legislation when they take office in 2009. (You can show your support for the Employee Free Choice Act by clicking here to sign our online card.)
Despite a heavily funded corporate campaign attacking them for supporting the bill, congressional candidates are coming forward to fight for employee free choice. Rep. Steve Kagen (D-Wis.) is the latest to openly back the bill. (See video.) An original co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act, Kagen says:
(The Employee Free Choice Act) provides the opportunity for every working man and woman in America to form an effective union. And we need effective unions to guarantee our quality of life.
In their attack ads, corporate front groups falsely claim the Employee Free Choice Act would take away workers’ right to a private ballot to determine if they want a union. New research by the workers’ rights group American Rights at Work shows that many employers are taking advantage of U.S. labor laws intended to protect workers’ rights to form unions. Instead, American Rights at Work’s research shows “aggressive misconduct from management widely prevents workers from exercising their choice.”
American Rights at Work’s research also confirms that in the current company-dominated system when workers file a petition with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to hold an election, employers often try to prevent the vote from ever taking place. In four out of 10 cases, workers who ask for an NLRB-supervised election never get a chance to vote. In cases that actually reach an election, nearly half are spoiled by employers engaging in illegal activity, according to American Rights at Work. Specifically, in 46 percent of elections, employers interfere with the NLRB-supervised election process by firing pro-union employees, cutting back on workers’ hours, making groundless demotions and using other intimidating tactics.
That’s why many workers support the majority sign-up system to choose a union. One provision of the Employee Free Choice Act would require employers to recognize a union if a majority of workers indicate their choice of a union by signing union cards. Currently, the employer can ignore the employees’ choice and demand an NLRB election.
In a second study, American Rights at Work found that, since 2003, more than half a million Americans formed unions through a majority sign-up. They include 64,000 hotel and casino workers, 46,000 home care providers,11,000 UPS Freight workers and 8,000 farm workers jointly employed by Mount Olive Pickle Co. and the North Carolina Growers Association. In fact, the process has worked so well there are now 22 laws in 12 states that grant certain public and private employees the right to form unions through the majority sign-up process. Click here to read the two studies.
Passage of the Employee Free Choice Act may be the biggest economic reform since the New Deal in the 1930s, says Mark Weisbrot. Writing on AlterNet, he says passing the bill would help raise the wages, benefits and working conditions of most workers. Read Weisbrot’s full column here.
One of the most important problems that our economy has faced for the last 30 years has been stagnating real wages. This is amazing, when we consider that productivity—the amount that workers produce per hour—increased quite substantially over the period. One important reason for this great leap backwards is that the rights of workers to organize and bargain collectively have been sharply curtailed over the last three decades.
(The Employee Free Choice Act) would probably change Americans’ lives more than any legislation since the New Deal brought us Social Security. The political influence of millions of new union members would also bring us closer to such basic reforms as universal health care. It’s all long overdue.
2 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.













It is important to realize that there are many states that don’t have protection or statutes that protect workers. Employees will lose their jobs for mentioning the Union word. I personally would like to see the AFL/CIO lead a campaign supporting all workers, whether represented or not. Jobs are the important issue in this campaign and McCain just doesn’t get it. A good place to start is Whistle Blower Protection for Federal Employees. The key to successful organizing is to get all workers on your side.
Which side are you on?
Are you on your side and the side of fellow workers, or are you on the side of the anti-union, anti-worker, anti-you corptocracy that has seized control of Washington D.C.?
There is no middle ground.
The EFCA is but one of the many glaring differences between Obama and McCain.
Obama supports the EFCA, McCain doesn’t.
Obama wants to implement health care for all. McCain wants to tax your health care benefits.
Obama wants to create jobs through public works projects and in doing so rebuild our nation’s decaying infrastructure. McCain wants to give more tax breaks to the super-rich and continue relying on “free market, trickle-down” economics to cure our nation’s economic woes.
Obama wants a phased, responsible, safe withdrawal from Iraq. McCain is willing to leave our troops there for 100 years in order to achieve “victory”, although he cannot explain his definition of “victory”.
Obama wants to strengthen public education. McCain wants to fund private schools with our public tax dollars.
Obama wants to punish corporations that move U.S. jobs offshore. McCain wants to give them tax breaks.
Obama says that NAFTA, WTO, CAFTA, must be changed to become more worker friendly. McCain favors more flawed, pro-corporate trade schemes.
Obama wants to increase the federal minimum wage. McCain wants to eliminate it.
Obama wants to strengthen OSHA regulations and add more inspectors. McCain wants to starve it to death.
Obama wants to protect Social Security. McCain wants to privatize it.
Like I said earlier, there are many glaring differences between pro-worker Obama and anti-worker McCain. I’ve listed just a few.
Now it’s up to you. Are you going to vote for a friend of labor or an enemy of labor? (Hint: If it’s the latter, and a couple of years from now you lose your medical benefits, or watch your job sail offshore, look in the mirror to find the cause of your misery.)
When workers vote in their own best interests they are at the same time voting in the best interests of their families, and of other workers and their families. That’s unity! (As in U-N-I-O-N)
When a worker votes for an enemy of labor he/she deserves whatever consequences follow.