Home

SEARCH

Heartland Lockout: Another Reason for the Employee Free Choice Act

 

by James Parks, Oct 20, 2008

Photo credit: Helena Worthen
AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka talks with locked-out workers at Heartland Human Services.

A look at what’s going on at the Heartland Human Services in Effingham, Ill., offers yet another example of why passage of the Employee Free Choice Act is needed to provide fairness in the workplace.

For more than two years, some 50 workers at Heartland, members of AFSCME Council 31, have been seeking a fair contract with decent pay and benefits. After they unconditionally ended a yearlong strike in June, management at Heartland, a nonprofit mental health counseling facility, locked them out.

Last week, AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka joined the Heartland workers’ picket line to show solidarity and deliver a message to management that the union movement considers this fight a national symbol of the failure of American labor laws to protect the rights of workers.

Says Trumka:

I’ve seen a lot of labor conflicts all across the country and I can tell you that the behavior of Heartland management is worse than that of almost any big profit-driven company I’ve encountered. We are here to shine the bright light of justice on Heartland Human Services before the world. This fight for fairness is the essence of the labor movement’s struggle. These workers are an inspiration to us all.

Anders Lindall, a spokesman for District 31, says:

It is clear that Heartland doesn’t want anything but to get rid of this union and, as such, it is becoming a national symbol for the need for those legal reforms.

The Heartland employees, who provide mental health counseling for patients with addictions, formed a union in February 2006. After contract talks failed, they walked out in July 2007. When the workers ended the strike without conditions in June 2008, management locked them out.

AFSCME says that for months at a time during the strike and lockout, Heartland management refused to meet with the union or a federal mediator altogether. Management hired replacement workers and paid them more than these employees were paid for the same work.

Trumka, who delivered a $10,000 check from the AFL-CIO to the workers, said the lockout is “a classic example of what’s wrong with America’s labor laws:” He noted that under the Employee Free Choice Act, employers would face mandatory arbitration if they did not bargain seriously with workers’ unions. Sen. Barack Obama is a co-sponsor of the bill.

Trumka sums up the situation this way:

Sixteen months is a long time to have families disrupted. Enough is enough. America can do better than this. Illinois can do better than this and I know management can do better than this.

  Become a Fan on Facebook   Follow Us on Twitter   Subscribe to YouTube   Subscribe to Blog RSS

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (5)

5 Comments

  1. union friend on 21.10.2008 at 14:27 (Reply)

    Was Heartland allowed to fire the workers that went on strike? I didn’t think they could. I wonder if the Heartland employees could actually sue for lost wages. I also think it is illegal for the employees to be locked out. My advice to the new hirees is to walk off the job! It is my guess they got paid more so they won’t.

    Good luck to the members of the AFSCME Council 31. I hope you succeed!

  2. ChicanoWobbly on 21.10.2008 at 16:04 (Reply)

    Of course Heartland doesn’t give a damn about the interests of their patients, otherwise they would not treat their employees so bad! Poor working conditions along with low wages does NOT make for quality delivery of services!

    How does Heartland justify the noncontinuity of care to Medicare and/or Medicaid??

  3. ChicanoWobbly on 21.10.2008 at 16:04 (Reply)

    Of course Heartland doesn’t give a damn about the interests of their patients, otherwise they would not treat their employees so bad! Poor working conditions along with low wages does NOT make for quality delivery of services!

    How does Heartland justify the noncontinuity of care to Medicare and/or Medicaid??

  4. dportjoe on 22.10.2008 at 11:00 (Reply)

    Yeah they can replace workers it’s a legacy of Reagan. This is fallout from the effort to move public jobs to community based jobs.

  5. cappy on 23.10.2008 at 18:12 (Reply)

    I am one of the locked out workers at Heartland.
    We have to find a way to stop the public sector jobs from becoming privite non-profit jobs. During this strike we have found out how unsupervised these businesses are while getting government money. This business recieves over 3 million dollars a year of state money but is not held accountable to anyone for it. They have a board of directors that has been hand picked by the exective director of 30 years. The board is full of people that go along with whatever she says. The board does not answer to anyone.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Contact Us | Disclaimer