Home

SEARCH

Voters Reject Corporate Lies About Employee Free Choice

Bookmark and Share

by James Parks, Nov 10, 2008

Photo credit: CWA

Voters last Tuesday soundly rejected the misleading anti-union corporate campaign opposing the Employee Free Choice Act and overwhelmingly backed candidates who support working families.

A poll by Peter D. Hart Research Associates commissioned by the workers’ rights advocacy group American Rights at Work shows that anti-union advertising was among the least important factors in determining voters’ choices for U.S. Senate and that they continue to support making it easier for workers to join unions. 

Says American Rights at Work Chair David Bonior: 

No matter how hard corporate interests tried to mislead voters, it just didn’t work. State by state, millions were spent, but the fact remains, the Employee Free Choice Act never became the wedge issue corporate interests sought. 

Six newly elected senators expressed strong support for the bill, despite the millions of dollars the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the business community spent to try and defeat them. The new senators—Rep. Mark Udall of Colorado, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Rep. Tom Udall of New Mexico, Kay Hagan of North Carolina, Mark Warner of Virginia and Jeff Merkley of Oregon—could play a key role in passing the legislation.

The bill did not come to the Senate floor last year after senators failed by nine votes to invoke cloture. The atmosphere also is different at the White House. While President Bush had promised to veto the bill, President-elect Barack Obama co-sponsored the bill in the Senate and has said he will work to pass the bill once he takes office.   

Here are the main findings of the poll:

  • Nearly two-thirds (60 percent) of voters believe it is important to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, and nearly one-third (31 percent) of voters strongly believe it should be a priority for Congress.

  • When told about proposed legislation in Congress that would “make it easier for workers to form unions by allowing employees to be represented by a union when a majority of their co-workers sign cards saying they want to join that union,” voters favor the Employee Free Choice Act by nearly two to one (55 percent favor; 28 percent oppose).

  • Voters “are more than twice as likely to say big corporations having too much power (50 percent) create a bigger problem for people like them than big labor unions having too much power (23 percent).”

  • Overall, 55 percent of voters in these states say they approve of labor unions, compared with just 27 percent who say they disapprove.

Click here to read a summary of the poll.

Bonior puts it this way: 

We have only seen the beginning of the fight to restore workers’ rights in this country as we can expect more sound and fury from opponents of this bill. But voters have clearly spoken. In our current economic climate, the American public is hungry for measures to strengthen the middle class, and our new Congress should heed this call and make it a priority to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. 

Workers are supporting the Employee Free Choice Act because it gives working people the freedom to make their own decision about whether and how to form a union. Working people are struggling to make ends meet and the Employee Free Choice Act will allow more people to bargain for better wages and working conditions—which in turn helps rebuild our middle class and create an economy that works for all.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (5)

5 Comments

  1. pemmert2 on 12.11.2008 at 13:21 (Reply)

    John McCain helped our Employee Free Choice Act cause. We had union members who thought he was a “nice guy”. When they heard some of his speeches where he came right out and attacked unions and the Employee Free Choice Act, they voted for Obama. Several union members that I know said McCain said on television that he didn’t like unions. I thank Senator McCain for showing his true colors.

  2. kwwiz on 12.11.2008 at 14:56 (Reply)

    I’ve been waiting to hear from President -Elect Obama and the newly elected Congress how quickly they will introduce this legislation. I know Obama has said the tax cuts and energy are his top priorities, as they should be. But we in labor know how important this legislation is to us, and I would like to tell our membership that it’s going to be sooner rather then later. As a co-sponser I know Obama will keep his word of ” not a matter of if, but when”, he’s elected he will sign the legislation. Unfortunately we still don’t have a fillibuster proof Senate. Anybody hearing anything on this?

    1. union friend on 12.11.2008 at 17:43 (Reply)

      Not yet, but I think Al Frankin has a good chance of winning Minnesota. Also Maryland just last night got another Democratic Representative in Frank Kratovil. However, the Senatorial race in Alaska is looking suspicious. Many people are beginning to think there is something very sneaky going on. For one thing, the increased numbers of Democrat registrations don’t match with the actual number of voters; nor does it make any sense that Alaskans, no matter what party they are from, would actually vote for a felon. I see “Palin” written all over this one.

  3. John Bryans Fontaine on 13.11.2008 at 17:00 (Reply)

    Now that Barack Obama has been elected to the White House, the greatest political issue that we face is enacting the Employee Free Choice Act ASAP.

  4. jim6 on 14.11.2008 at 17:06 (Reply)

    We are letting business frame the issue as “protection of the secret ballot”. This is the message which is being given out through the media and we need to change the terms of the debate quickly. The vicious anti-union tactics (which make a free election all but impossible) are hardly getting a mention. It is important for us to respond to media reports in a way that will change the terms of the debate. Also we should focus on the pro-corporate assumptions which are being taught as “education”.

    It may be necessary to do something to bring around 3-4 moderate Republicans to break a filibuster. How about some “outside the box” ideas?

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Contact Us | Disclaimer