Home

SEARCH

Chambliss Faces Subpoena Over Sugar Blast that Killed 14 Workers

Bookmark and Share

by Seth Michaels, Nov 18, 2008

Tragedy struck a Georgia factory in February when combustible dust caught fire and exploded at the Imperial Sugar plant in Port Wentworth, killing 14 workers and injuring many more.

 

Now, Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.), an opponent of working families who’s in a tough runoff to defend his Senate seat, is facing questions about whether he improperly aided Imperial in its efforts to avoid the consequences of its negligence.

 

The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) hit the company with $5 million in fines for “willful and egregious safety violations” over the blast. And a Senate subcommittee held a hearing in July, finding that Imperial had no plan to deal with the dangerous combustible dust and ignored warnings about plant safety.

 

During that hearing, Chambliss—who has received $21 thousand  in campaign contributions this election cycle from the sugar industry—berated a corporate whistle-blower who exposed the dangerous conditions at the plant.

 

Mark Tate, an attorney representing families of two workers killed in the blast as well as two injured workers, has subpoenaed Chambliss to testify about his involvement in trying to protect Imperial Sugar from consequences of the explosion. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports that Chambliss is accused of interfering with the case both inside and outside of Congress.

 

Tate says he wants to know if Imperial Sugar executives persuaded Chambliss to sharply criticize a company whistle-blower during a July Senate hearing on the explosion. He says he also wants the senator to respond to plaintiffs’ claims that the company arranged a meeting between Chambliss and victims’ families to dissuade them from suing.

 

Chambliss is refusing to answer the subpoena and testify about his actions, but Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) says his claims of immunity don’t stand up to scrutiny.

 

Neither does the anti-worker record of Chambliss. He has opposed workers’ interests on issues like the minimum wage and overtime protection. Chambliss needs to put workers first and come clean about his relationship with Imperial Sugar.

 

Chambliss’ opponent in the Senate race, Jim Martin, has been endorsed by the AFL-CIO. You can contribute here to help replace Chambliss in the Senate.

___________________________

Paid for by the AFL-CIO Committee on Political Education Political Contributions Committee, www.aflcio.org, and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.

.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (3)

3 Comments

  1. Rich A. on 19.11.2008 at 15:43 (Reply)

    Dear Georgia Voters –

    Wake up!

    Saxby Chambliss does not deserve to be re-elected to the US Senate. He didn’t deserve to get elected in 2002!

    He is scum among dregs.

    In the 2002 race, Chambliss had the gall to attack Democratic incumbent Senator Max Cleland for being “soft on war and homeland security”. Max Cleland is a veteran of the Viet Nam war who lost three limbs in combat while Chambliss was busy getting five military deferments!

    How dare Chambliss question the patriotism of a war hero!

    What could have been going through the minds of Georgia voters in 2002?

    Here it is, 2008. You have a chance to redeem yourselves. You have a chance to vote Chambliss out of office! If you do not, don’t come around talking about patriotism or the flag. I’ll send you packing. If you re-elect Chambliss you’ll be showing the rest of America that the people in Georgia are more interested in supporting dirty politicians than they are about doing the right thing.

    Do the right thing in 2008. Dump Chambliss in the re-vote!

  2. Timufcw on 19.11.2008 at 16:00 (Reply)

    Just think, if the Rebpublicans keep all of this up, one day they will cease to exist. I can hardly wait!
    Tim

    PS When Bush dies, he has a one way ticket to you know where and it’s not up.

  3. facts_not_fear on 24.11.2008 at 15:12 (Reply)

    What were Georgian voters thinking in 2002? Actually, evidence is that they were thinking straight, but their voting machines were a little crooked. The entire election was outsourced to Diebold. Not only did Diebold machines capture the votes, Diebold employees counted them! That’s right. The State of Georgia did not count the votes of their own election. They contracted it out.

    here’s the latest:

    http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Allegations_about_2002_Georgia_election_raise_1121.html

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Register to Comment and sign up to get action alerts and e-news.

 
Jeff Crosby
What happened in Massachusetts? Democrats forgot the working class.
Read more diaries from the field >>
 
Jody Heymann
U.S.: Bottom of the Pack for Bread-and-Butter Basics
 
Contact Us | Disclaimer