Home

SEARCH

Bush Denies Bargaining Rights to 8,600 Federal Workers

Bookmark and Share

by James Parks, Dec 2, 2008

In a final-days attack on workers’ rights, President Bush yesterday issued an executive order that denies collective bargaining rights to about 8,600 federal employees who work in national security, law enforcement and intelligence.

Nearly 1,000 of the workers currently are represented by a union, and some have been for more than 30 years. The biggest group affected by the order is the 5,000 employees of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), which is now part of the Justice Department.

Peter Winch, national organizer for AFGE, the largest federal employee union, says the union is determined to fight the executive order.

Bush’s actions are within his legal discretion, but he has abused that discretion. There is no reason for this action. Nothing has happened from yesterday to today to change the national security situation to require such a change.

We’re asking President-elect Obama when he takes office to review all exclusions [from collective bargaining] since 1978. Several exclusions by this president were not done for national security reasons, but to stop unions.

In the executive order, Bush said it would be inconsistent with “national security requirements” to allow the employees to engage in collective bargaining over the conditions of their employment.

This is the same rationale the White House used in 2003 to deny bargaining rights to workers at the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) in one of the first shots in the Bush administration’s war on federal workers.

Although transportation security officers (TSOs) remain deprived of the freedom to bargain collectively, AFGE has 10,000 TSA members in 22 locals nationwide and regularly represents these employees before the TSA Disciplinary Review Board, the Equal Opportunity Commission, Congress and in the courts. And that number is growing. More than 100 TSOs at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport and Dallas Love Field joined AFGE Local 1040 in August.

Says Local 1040 President Greg Gallo:

AFGE has stood behind TSOs in Dallas for seven years, but this new local means that TSOs will have a voice at home, not just one nationally. As a member of TSA’s first class in 2001, I have seen the ups and downs at the agency. Unfortunately, there are mostly downs, so an AFGE presence is imperative to boosting confidence and morale.

AFGE President John Gage agrees.

The new local signifies a growing trend among TSOs that they want local representation, while belonging to the largest—and among the most influential—federal employee union in the nation.

The latest executive order also covers certain workers in the Energy Department, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Air Marshal Service, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the U.S. Coast Guard and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (6)

6 Comments

  1. gregoryjbell on 03.12.2008 at 13:50 (Reply)

    We are grateful to AFGE for supporting TSA against the irresponsibility of the Bush administration in denying our freedom to bargain collectively. We are thankful for President-elect Barack Obama’s willingness to review our position, and all congressmen that have supported Bill HR 3212. A bill introduced by Rep. Nita Lowey (D-N.Y.) that would grant Transportation Security Officers the same workplace rights as other employees in the Department of Homeland Security, and in the federal government.

    Gregory Bell
    Local 0442 President, AFGE
    Transportation Security Agency (TSA)

  2. Hitechredneck on 03.12.2008 at 13:57 (Reply)

    Just another example of the anit-union animus of the Bush Administration. Does this surprise anyone?

  3. caronome on 03.12.2008 at 14:08 (Reply)

    Does this go through Congress? If so, you can petition Congress to override this obscene act. They should be good for something. If not, just ignore the whole stupid thing. Nobody can stop a group of people from meeting and discussing the important issues.
    If this isn’t possible, then Obama will have to void the act. There will be many evil things that Shrub will do before he is out of our hair.
    Then lets hope he is indicted for the crimes that he and his crime family have commited.

  4. coloneblogger on 03.12.2008 at 14:35 (Reply)

    You understated it when you said, “President Bush cemented his
    reputation as one of the most anti-worker presidents ever when
    he issued an executive order denying collective bargaining
    rights to some 8,600 federal employees…….” You still don’t get it? The Cheney/bush Regime has been all about the rich! In 8 years, they have done absolutely nothing specifically designed to benefit the people. No, a far more accurate description is; “the Cheney/bush Administration is by far the most incompetent, corrupt, anti people administration in US history.” Pass it on.

  5. the door on 03.12.2008 at 16:56 (Reply)

    Those damn executive orders. In 1862 President Lincoln issued one it was called the Emancipation Proclamation. Eisenhower used an EO to desegregate schools.

    “Stroke of the pen. Law of the Land. Kinda cool.”
    Paul Begala, former Clinton adviser, The New York Times, July 5, 1998

    “We’ve switched the rules of the game. We’re not trying to do anything legislatively.”
    Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, The Washington Times, June 14, 1999

    The U.S. Constitution still means something. Like it or not.

  6. Charlie on 03.12.2008 at 20:05 (Reply)

    For a candidate who campaigned as a compassionate consertative he missed the boat there as much as his miss in searching for Osama ben Laden and weapons of mass distruction in Iraq. It is a shame so many stupid voters gave him a second term after the U.S. Supreme Court gave him his first. Trickey Dick Nixon had nothing in tricks up his sleeve compared to this guy. Still I wonder, will the voters ever learn???

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Register to Comment and sign up to get action alerts and e-news.

 
Jeff Crosby
Out in the grassroots, workers are mighty angry at the thought their health care benefits could be taxed in a health care reform plan.
Read more diaries from the field >>
 
Ari A. Matusiak
Young America Wants Health Care Reform
 
Contact Us | Disclaimer