SEARCH
Trumka: Give Workers, Not Their Bosses, the Choice on Forming a Union |
|
![]() |
||||
|
||||
In the latest issue of International Union Rights, the journal of the International Centre for Trade Union Rights (ICTUR), AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer explains what the Employee Free Choice Act would mean for America’s workers and the entire economy and makes a strong case why the freedom of America’s workers to form unions and bargain matters for workers around the world.
Trumka says the Employee Free Choice Act is necessary to bring balance to workplaces and put decisions about forming a union back where they belong—in the hands of workers:
Currently, an employer can demand a company-controlled election and workers would have no say in the matter. The Employee Free Choice Act would require the NLRB to certify a bargaining representative without mandating an election if a majority of the bargaining unit employees signed such cards in the majority sign-up. Most critically, the choice would be up to the workers, not management.
In short, the Employee Free Choice Act would guarantee workers their right to choose a bargaining representative either through majority sign-up or a ballot election process. It would thus give the choice of whether to join a union to the workers themselves instead of to companies.
Trumka takes a critical look at America’s union-busting industry and at the multimillion-dollar campaigns that big corporations are using to defeat workers’ union campaigns in individual workplaces. Trumka starts with the story of Kelly Beringer, a nurse who faced harassment and interference in her attempts to join a union, but he notes that she’s not alone—recent studies have shown that far too many employers act with impunity to intimidate, pressure and even fire employees seeking a union:
Employers in this country have a lot of assistance in fighting unionization. In fact, union-busting is a $4 billion industry in the United States. When faced with a group of workers who want to form a union, U.S. employers all too often turn to these firms, packed with corporate lawyers who, for a steep price, provide them with all the dirty tricks they can undertake inside and outside the law.
Trumka notes that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and their corporate allies also are dumping millions into crushing efforts to create legislation to give workers a fair shot at forming a union:
Opponents of the Employee Free Choice Act have launched a $200 million campaign to defeat it. Working through front groups with innocuous-sounding names like the Center for Union Facts, organizations like the National Association of Manufacturers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and giant corporations are bombarding the airwaves and filling major newspapers with pricey advertisements designed to turn public opinion against the proposed legislation. More crucially, their lobbyists are deluging lawmakers in Congress with repeated visits and contacts to pressure them into voting against the bill when it comes up this year.
Supporters of workers’ rights around the world are stepping up to push back against the vicious campaigns against unions and the Employee Free Choice Act, Trumka says.
You can get a copy of the latest issue of International Union Rights here.
2 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.













If there was ever a time for the Employee Free Choice Act, that time is now. Not only is it nearly impossible to form a union without fear and intimidation by employers, but union-busting has grown into a $4 billion a year business in the U.S. alone. Companies that previously had good relationships with their union employees have been emboldened by weak labor laws. One of those is the McGraw-Hill Companies. Read more at:
http://nabetcwa54.org
Employees have always had a free choice. If this bill passes the threats to ones health if they do not sign said card will force people to form a union when in fact they do not want to.
I have seen it happen and i have seen the union force companys out of buisnes just to make a point.
The car manufactors are a good example of what happens when the unions are in control.