SEARCH
America’s Workers Oppose Taxing Health Care Benefits |
|
One of the most troubling health care reform proposals—taxing health care benefits—that had gained some traction in recent weeks appears to be slipping. Grassroots health care activists, President Obama and leading congressional Democrats have helped shed the light on, and slow the momentum of, this unfair tax that could boost working families’ tax liability by as much as 28 percent, according to the Commonwealth Fund.
Yesterday, the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call reported that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told Sen. Max Baucus (D- Mont.), chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, that any health care bill that included a tax on health care benefits and failed to include a strong public health insurance plan option would lose significant Democratic support. The paper said Reid told Baucus to drop
a proposal to tax health benefits and stop chasing Republican votes on a massive health care reform bill.
But conservative groups, most Republican leaders and others are expected to continue to push for the tax as health care reform legislation advances.
The Finance Committee still is developing its version of health care reform legislation. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee is putting the final touches on its package that includes a strong public plan option, shared responsibility with an employer “pay or play” provision, insurance market reforms to help stop private insurance industry abuses, cost containment and other provisions.
In the House, three committees—Education and Labor, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means—have developed the health care reform roadmap, one that AFL-CIO President John Sweeney says
encourages choice, competition and opportunity for all Americans to choose the health care that works for them.
Obama calls the Senate HELP Committee draft
legislation that lowers costs, protects the choice of doctors and plans and assures quality and affordable health care for Americans.
Neither the House nor the HELP Committee bill includes the health care benefits tax, but health care tax proponents will keep up the drumbeat for the tax. Currently, the health care benefits workers receive through an employer are not taxable. Some 160 million people have health care benefits tied to the workplace.
The money spent on providing health care coverage is tax-deductible to the employer and the employee is not taxed on it. Workers who get their health care coverage through employment, and the employers who provide it, already have seen years of health care costs climbing and their coverage shrinking through higher premiums, bigger co-pays, larger deductibles and more exclusions in coverage.
A study by the Commonwealth Fund found that workers with employer-provided benefits earning between $40,000 and $50,000 a year would see their tax liability increase by an average of 28 percent, while those earning between $50,000 and $75,000 would see an average increase of 20 percent. But people making more than $200,000 a year would only see an average increase in their tax liability of just one-tenth of 1 percent.
At a July 1 town hall meeting in Virginia, Obama told the crowd:
If you’ve got health insurance right now, you shouldn’t see your costs go up as part of health care reform.
In March, a study by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) showed a health care benefits tax would disproportionately hit workers in small firms and firms with older workers and retirees because insurance companies regularly charge higher rates for coverage of those workers.
Some of the pro-health care tax advocates say they would target only so-called high-cost “Cadillac” health care plans. The plans that supposedly allow workers Hollywood-like cosmetic surgeries and health spa stays. Those plans have become the mythical “welfare Cadillac” of health care reform.
Longtime business and health journalist Merrill Goozner writes on his blog Gooznews on Health:
There are very few plans out there whose high prices are determined by the generosity of their benefits. The vast majority of costs in high price plans are driven by the other two factors: they are either in high-cost areas or they cover costly patients, or both.
Any final health care reform plan that includes a health care benefits tax will certainly lose public support. A 2009 national survey by Lake Research Partners found that 80 percent of likely voters are opposed to taxing health care benefits. That was shown to be true in last year’s presidential election where many voters said Sen. John McCain’s proposal to tax health care benefits was a major deciding factor in their votes for Obama.
Recently on the Bill Press Show, Sheet Metal Workers (SMWIA) President Michael J. Sullivan said:
Any bill that taxes health care benefits is dead on arrival. That is a promise and where I come from a promise made is a promise kept….We are already subsidizing employers who don’t provide health care benefits and are being punished because we’ve done the right thing, our employers have done the right thing and our members have sacrificed wage increases for their health care benefits. So why are we the ones who are being penalized?
2 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.












You know, you could count on the Republicans to make sure every single aspect of our lives is taxed, while they secretively avoid paying taxes on their own wealth by legislating the enabling tax loopholes, which only benefit the wealthy. It is time for single payer, and the time is now! The Democrats in Washington have to stop kowtowing to the Republicans for the sake of bi-partisanship. They should certainly have realized by now that the Republicans have absolutely no intention to work with the Democrats in a bi-partisan show of cooperation and fair legislation.
How ironic that the “tea baggers’” main intent was to criticize high taxes, yet they are the ones who pay so little. Under the Obama administration, those making $250K or less will actually pay less in taxes; while those earning more will only pay a small percentage more. Even more ironic is that the very wealthy and the huge corporations actually pay much less in taxes than any other time in our history. What a bunch of sore losers and whiners.
True. Sometimes medical insurance might be of no use, but I have something I would like to share with you all. My son’s head was getting larger than normal. It was getting distinctive with time. He used to vomit excessively, and was getting weaker and weaker because of less sleep. At that time, we referred to a doctor, who sent us to the neurosurgeon, and then CT scans were taken on him. The result showed that there was an accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid. So, we need to carry out the shunt operation. It was a very dreadful feeling all over my mind on those days. It was also getting quite costly for me to handle all the medications, as it was going beyond the limit of health insurance. I need to keep him under constant surveillance, as any ignorance to even a small health problem may lead him to severe fatal problems. So, I decided to hire a health service which could take care of him thoroughly starting from medical checkup to even his diet. As he is required to be under constant surveillance, we hired a prevention plan for my family as well from a health care company named elite health (www.elitehealth.com). They used to monitor his health at regular interval, have interactions with them regarding any health issues, provides him a facility to contact them immediately 24/7 for any health problems. Today he is 15 year old, happy, adjusted with what god has offered him. We have certainly saved a lot financially also, as we need not require spending unnecessarily on baseless checkups and doctor appointments. Such wellness program really is the wise investments for those who are really in the need for such a service.