Home

SEARCH

Kaiser Model Shows the Way to Improving Health Care Delivery

 

by Mike Hall, Jul 25, 2009

 
   

Using a combination of integrated, team-based care and technology, Kaiser Permanente of Southern California developed a Healthy Bones initiative that not only reduced fractures in the most at-risk patients by 37 percent, but lowered the care cost for the same patients by 30 percent.

Similar Kaiser programs have reduced heart disease deaths and treatment costs in Colorado and diabetes complications and costs in Hawaii.

Yesterday, a forum hosted by the National Labor College (NLC) and the Kaiser Permanente Health Care Institute explored how health care delivery and quality can be vastly improved and costs significantly lowered with integrated care and technology and by maximizing the unique labor-management partnership at Kaiser Permanente, where some 96,000 health care workers are unionized.

With the nation in the midst of a debate over how to reform the nation’s broken health care system and how to expand and improve care and reduce costs, the Kaiser model provides a promising blueprint.

One of the cornerstones of Kaiser’s success is the labor-management partnership that allows all caregivers a voice developing and delivering new care initiatives.

In an interview during a break in the presentations, George Halvorson, chairman and CEO of Kaiser Permanente, said:

The labor-management partnership has been very productive. It’s been a huge asset and a lot of this that we are doing with the labor-management partnership would translate to other places.

Halvorson says it would be a mistake to reform health care—whether reform includes expanding coverage, establishing new insurance company rules or financing—without reforming the way health care is delivered

Integrated care ensures that everyone is involved in a patient’s care, from primary physician to specialists, pharmacist, nurse and others, and that new technology allows that information to be shared and analyzed. Speaking at the forum, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said a health care reform proposal without integrated health care reform “is not optional.” He adds that the team-based care concept is vital.

I think is perhaps our most significant work together-the use of what are called “unit-based” teams to bring doctors, nurses, technicians, pharmacists and other caregivers together on behalf of patients.

The results have included startling improvements in patient outcomes, reductions in medical errors, better preventative care, cost savings and a better, more satisfying work environment for everyone involved.

John August, executive director of the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions, told participants he believes the method by which Kaiser delivers health care can be successful elsewhere, but adds:

You’ve got to have a system where labor and management work together everyday…where workers can feel confident in the team.

He says when changes or new care plans come from a “top-down” management, with a “here’s the plan, implement it” style, it is likely not to have complete worker buy-in and enthusiasm. But with a team-based plan:

It doesn’t take much of a leap of faith to have confidence in it.

Sweeney says the Kaiser Permanente Labor Management Partnership has provided “a framework for what every health care delivery system should do,”

and that’s break down walls and bring caregivers together so they can use new technology and coordinate care 24-hours-a-day.

  Become a Fan on Facebook   Follow Us on Twitter   Subscribe to YouTube   Subscribe to Blog RSS

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (3)

3 Comments

  1. Granny on the Warpath on 27.07.2009 at 14:36 (Reply)

    Another hurdle is the FDA (also known as the Faulty Drug Administration). The FDA has a cozy relationship with Big Pharma that does not allow drugs not tested in the US to be approved, so we are not able to use foreign tested drugs unless they go through long and expensive procedures to get them approved in the US. That keeps a lot of safer drugs tested over the years in Europe, Scandinavia and Japan out of our market while we are being used as guinea pigs for newer and questionable drugs. Is the FDA so egotistical that they believe that European medicine is unsafe for us? Or that only the US can properly test drugs? We are losing a lot of safer, cheaper options this way by allowing Big Pharma to run the FDA. This is one of the first places to start health care reform and give us more options in healthcare.

  2. TrueDemocrat on 27.07.2009 at 17:25 (Reply)

    Granny: and cut into their profits? FDA is in bed with Big Pharma, along with Baucus, and others crafting our “reform”.

  3. garyro1 on 03.08.2009 at 07:37 (Reply)

    Personally speaking, if the congress cannot or will not pass a comprehensive overhaul of the healthcare industry; time to start thinking about total nationalization of healthcare and adopt a plan like the French.

    Recall elections should be planned against those in the senate and house blocking meaningful reforms. Forcing the reps and senators to “spend” all that loot they recieved from big pharm/healthcare industry in just staying in their jobs should keep them busy so that meaningful reform can be passed.
    ———-

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/08/01/sirota/index.html
    has an excellent article today about our fearless leaders and money and what it buys in the healthcare industry.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Contact Us | Disclaimer