Home

SEARCH

The Missing Link in Clean-Energy Policy

Bookmark and Share
 

Andrea Buffa is a senior writer and policy associate at the Apollo Alliance.

What would it look like if the United States had a long-term national economic development policy—including an industrial policy—to grow the clean energy economy?

As the Senate debates comprehensive clean energy and climate legislation, and the issue of green jobs becomes increasingly important, now is the time to also consider developing comprehensive economic development and industrial policies. Because whether we’re talking about lithium-ion battery producers or wind turbine component manufacturers, the industries of the clean energy future need clear direction—and support—from the U.S. government if they are to compete and thrive in a low-carbon global economy.

In a new article by the Apollo Alliance, a clean energy, good jobs coalition that includes the AFL-CIO and union, environmental, business and community groups, Bob Baugh, executive director of the AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council, describes why a strong Buy America component is critical to these efforts.

Writing in “Economic Development: The Missing Link in a National Clean Energy Policy,” Baugh says a key policy essential to a clean-energy economic development policy designed to support a domestic clean-energy manufacturing industry is a local content requirement. Without such a requirement—also called a “Buy American” policy—most clean-energy manufacturing companies will likely locate overseas.

First and foremost, we actually have to put a serious Buy American/domestic-content policy in place. It matters where you make things. In the case of wind turbines and solar, 70 percent to 80 percent of the cost itself is in the product, not the installation. That means you have to have a strategy and a policy that says you’ll do it here.

Brian Sager, co-founder of Nanosolar, a solar power technology company, explained the need for an economic development policy that promotes domestic manufacturing as inextricably linked to the potential for clean energy innovations:

If we don’t have clean energy manufacturing in the U.S., we’ll lose our competitive advantage in the long term. Building a solar plant can’t be  outsourced—you have to build it where the power is needed. And when you have your manufacturing engineers near your R&D engineers, that’s the key to innovation. Physical proximity is extremely important. The innovation cycle is slowed down when these people are thousands of miles away from each other.

Read the full article here.

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article |Comments (3)

3 Comments

  1. leenaree on 20.10.2009 at 12:56 (Reply)

    Two other reasons for incentivizing domestic development:

    Recycling weath - this keeps the development dollars and the dollars spent for labor in the country, and buying products within the country.

    Reducing fossil fuel use - if the manufacturing is done close to where the finished products will be used, you reduce the fossil fuel costs of transporting them, especially overseas.

  2. sailorman on 20.10.2009 at 13:25 (Reply)

    I have been trying to get this off the ground for three years and now you have discovered it. Sailability Horseshoe Bar project 8 january 2008 proposed Hemet Public Library for third time. What took so long?

  3. Steve Neubeck on 20.10.2009 at 15:02 (Reply)

    It should be clear by now that the so called “fire(financial,insurance,real estate)” economy is not productive and has led this country and the rest of the world down the road to ruin.we need good paying productive jobs to have ameaningful sustained recovery

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Register to Comment and sign up to get action alerts and e-news.

 
Jeff Crosby
What happened in Massachusetts? Democrats forgot the working class.
Read more diaries from the field >>
 
Jody Heymann
U.S.: Bottom of the Pack for Bread-and-Butter Basics
 
Contact Us | Disclaimer