<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lie of the Year: &#8216;Death Panel&#8217; Attack on Health Care Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/12/23/lie-of-the-year-death-panel-attack-on-health-care-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/12/23/lie-of-the-year-death-panel-attack-on-health-care-reform/</link>
	<description>News for working families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: baymike51</title>
		<link>http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/12/23/lie-of-the-year-death-panel-attack-on-health-care-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-15620</link>
		<dc:creator>baymike51</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aflcio.org/?p=23766#comment-15620</guid>
		<description>Whew! Thats a relief. While I agree the term death panel is an over reach, much like this whole health reform thing. I&#039;m still a little,actually a lot concerned about the medicare advisory board thing. What exactly is that? Why did those democrats that were having a love affair with protect it from future regulation with a super majority of 67 votes? How is that right? Shouldn&#039;t we look into this before we just accept that these fine people would never do anything to harm us. NAFTA anybody?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whew! Thats a relief. While I agree the term death panel is an over reach, much like this whole health reform thing. I&#8217;m still a little,actually a lot concerned about the medicare advisory board thing. What exactly is that? Why did those democrats that were having a love affair with protect it from future regulation with a super majority of 67 votes? How is that right? Shouldn&#8217;t we look into this before we just accept that these fine people would never do anything to harm us. NAFTA anybody?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

