Go Home

Proposed Commission Is Fast Track to Cutting Social Security, Medicare

by Mike Hall, Jan 14, 2010

 
   

Next week, the U.S. Senate will vote on legislation that a few years down the road could slash Social Security and Medicare benefits without any further debate or consideration by Congress.

The so-called Entitlement Reform Commission is the creation of Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.) and Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), who plan to offer an amendment to create the commission to debt ceiling legislation.

This special appointed commission would supposedly create a blueprint to reduce the deficit by cutting vital government programs, including Social Security and Medicare. But under the Gregg-Conrad scheme, the panel’s recommendation would be “fast tracked” with no amendments allowed, just an up-or-down vote, and that, says the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare (NCPSSM), is a process

designed to minimize Congress’ role in making these vital decisions. Or as some might argue, to provide political cover for those decisions.

Read the rest of this entry »

Permalink >>

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (8)

Jobs Creation or Deficit Reduction? The Public Has Decided

by Tula Connell, Dec 4, 2009

 
   

Stop by any corner grocery store and ask the people standing in line: What do you worry about most—jobs or the nation’s budget deficit?

If they don’t choke up laughing, chances are real high they’ll give the same response as did the public in two recent polls:

Priority #1: Jobs.

Priority #2: Jobs.

Priority #3: Jobs.

A poll for Democracy Corps published Nov. 30 found that when given a choice, “voters embrace a bold jobs initiative over a long-term deficit reduction program by two-to-one.” A survey taken by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) earlier this fall revealed the same: The Hart Research Associates poll found that by a margin of 53 percent to 42 percent, the public is more concerned about rising unemployment rates than the rising federal deficit.

Read the rest of this entry »

Permalink >>

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (0)

Dear Senator: Please Support Public Option and Save My Life

by Mike Hall, Oct 8, 2009

Photo credit: John Small  
  Ready to hit Capitol Hill with hundreds of letters written by union members are, from left, Richard Burke of CWA in Maine; Jeanine Maury of CWA in Washington state; Rick Bender, president of the Washington State Labor Council; and Mark Froemke, president of the West Minnesota Area Labor Council.  
 
   

Today, state and local union activists are continuing to deliver the more than 42,000 personally written letters from union members and Working America members calling on Congress to pass comprehensive health care reform legislation.

The letters are part of a massive nationwide week of health care action. Union leaders and activists are spending two days in Washington, D.C., delivering the letters and talking with their senators and representatives about the need for strong health care reform legislation that provides guaranteed coverage for all, includes a public health insurance option and more.

Yesterday, working Americans across the country took part in the National Call-In Day for Health Care Reform, sending their senators strong messages.

Read the rest of this entry »

Permalink >>

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (3)

Rockefeller’s Public Option Killed in Senate Finance’s Health Care Bill

by Tula Connell, Sep 29, 2009

UPDATE: Schumer’s public option amendment got killed as well, 10-13, with Baucus, Conrad and Lincoln voting against it. Disgrace.

Looks like one version of public option just got killed in the Senate Finance Committee. Sen. Jay Rockefeller’s public option amendment, the strongest of the public option amendments offered, was just voted down 15-8, with five Democrats voting against it: Sens. Max Baucus (Mont.), Tom Carper (Del.), Kent Conrad (N.D.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Bill Nelson (Fla.).

As Rockefeller said before the vote:

Why would we not do this? People come second and the profits come first if we’re against this.

Read the rest of this entry »

Permalink >>

Print This Article | E-Mail This Article | Comments (14)


All Archived Posts »

Contact Us | Disclaimer